IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v26y2023i8p1224-1253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the destination management performance of small islands with the fuzzy best-worst method and fuzzy simple additive weighting

Author

Listed:
  • Kafferine Yamagishi
  • Cecil Gantalao
  • Ann Myril Tiu
  • Reciel Ann Tanaid
  • Maria Esther Medalla
  • Dharyll Prince Abellana
  • Egberto Selerio
  • Lanndon Ocampo

Abstract

This work combines the fuzzy best-worst method for assigning weights of indicators and the fuzzy simple additive weighting method for evaluating performance, along with the TALC model, in generating a single-valued index that would holistically describe the performance of a destination (e.g. small islands). Grounded on a real-world application, the evaluation process proved useful in evaluating the performance of Bantayan Island (Philippines), with a high degree of flexibility in dealing with variations of domain applications with different groups of decision-makers in different settings. The findings, although highly case-specific, offer starting points of discussion in managing small island destinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kafferine Yamagishi & Cecil Gantalao & Ann Myril Tiu & Reciel Ann Tanaid & Maria Esther Medalla & Dharyll Prince Abellana & Egberto Selerio & Lanndon Ocampo, 2023. "Evaluating the destination management performance of small islands with the fuzzy best-worst method and fuzzy simple additive weighting," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 1224-1253, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:8:p:1224-1253
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2054404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2022.2054404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2022.2054404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:8:p:1224-1253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.