IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v26y2023i7p1183-1198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breaking bad behaviour: understanding negative film tourist behaviour through moral disengagement

Author

Listed:
  • Taran Jørgensen
  • Ina Reichenberger

Abstract

Film tourism’s benefits for stakeholders and destinations have received wide attention in academic research, but film tourists engaging in negative behaviour is becoming increasingly problematic. This study provides a first insight into this neglected challenge by adopting a morality perspective and asking, ‘how do film tourists justify engaging in negative tourist behaviour?’. We apply moral disengagement theory utilizing a quantitative scenario-based online survey for self-identified fans of the TV series ‘Breaking Bad’ and ‘Game of Thrones’ to examine which types of common negative film tourism behaviours respondents are willing to engage in, and how they justify these behaviours. Moral disengagement mechanisms that were applied most frequently focused on obscuring moral agency and distorting behavioural consequences; however, results suggest that the respective TV series’ moral alignment, as well as the situational context, influence if and how respondents are able and willing to justify negative behaviour. Results from this study can support film tourism stakeholders in appropriate destination development and in measures to mitigate common negative behaviours while aiding researchers in better understanding a diverse range of behaviours and challenges associated with film tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Taran Jørgensen & Ina Reichenberger, 2023. "Breaking bad behaviour: understanding negative film tourist behaviour through moral disengagement," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1183-1198, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:7:p:1183-1198
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2051447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2022.2051447
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2022.2051447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:7:p:1183-1198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.