IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v26y2023i2p289-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying Online Travel Reviews related to tourist attractions using NLP methods: the case of Guanajuato, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Guerrero-Rodriguez
  • Miguel Á. Álvarez-Carmona
  • Ramón Aranda
  • Adrián Pastor López-Monroy

Abstract

This research's main objective is to analyse Online Travel Reviews (OTRs) related to tourist attractions aiming at identifying recurring discussion topics/themes to infer whether travellers make reference to positive or negative experiences during their trips. This study focuses on the case of Guanajuato, a Mexican cultural destination. It is important to mention that similar analyses have not been carried out to study any Mexican destination so far. OTRs are analysed using two Natural Language Processing approaches: Mutual Information Ranking and Jaccard Coefficient. These are applied to quantify and extract the most representative themes and the main topics from each polarity within the OTRs. These techniques have been extensively studied in various areas, however, to the best of our knowledge, they have not been applied in digital tourism to detect essential issues during the travel experience. As a result, two recurrent negative themes/topics (‘cleanliness’, ‘prices’) were identified throughout this analysis. One surprising finding of this work relates to the lack of variation between national and international travellers' evaluations. The findings of this study contribute to confirming the role of OTRs within the contemporary tourist experience by identifying those places perceived negatively or positively directy from the visitors' perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Guerrero-Rodriguez & Miguel Á. Álvarez-Carmona & Ramón Aranda & Adrián Pastor López-Monroy, 2023. "Studying Online Travel Reviews related to tourist attractions using NLP methods: the case of Guanajuato, Mexico," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 289-304, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:289-304
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2021.2007227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2021.2007227
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2021.2007227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:289-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.