IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v25y2022i12p1876-1894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confirmatory aspect-level opinion mining processes for tourism and hospitality research: a proposal of DiSSBUS

Author

Listed:
  • Jongho Im
  • Taikgun Song
  • Youngsu Lee
  • Jewoo Kim

Abstract

We proposed a new rule-based text analysis method to effectively summarize and transform unstructured user-generated content (online customer reviews) into an analysable form for tourism and hospitality research. To differentiate this method, we developed the Disintegrating, Summarizing, Straining, Bagging, Upcycling, and Scoring – DiSSBUS – algorithm which can address the following problems in previous approaches: (1) false identification of irrelevant aspect terms, (2) improper handling of multiple aspects and sentiments within a text unit, and (3) data sparsity. The algorithm’s distinctive advantage is to decompose a single review into a set of bi-terms related to the aspects that are pre-specified based on domain knowledge. Therefore, this algorithm can identify customer opinions on specific aspects, which allows to extract variables of interest from online reviews. To evaluate the performance of our confirmatory aspect-level opinion-mining algorithm, we applied it to customer reviews on restaurants in Hawaii. The findings from the empirical test validated its effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jongho Im & Taikgun Song & Youngsu Lee & Jewoo Kim, 2022. "Confirmatory aspect-level opinion mining processes for tourism and hospitality research: a proposal of DiSSBUS," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 1876-1894, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:25:y:2022:i:12:p:1876-1894
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2021.1974357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2021.1974357
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2021.1974357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:25:y:2022:i:12:p:1876-1894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.