IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i4p479-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived food souvenir quality as a formative second-order construct: how do tourists evaluate the quality of food souvenirs?

Author

Listed:
  • Chaang-Iuan Ho
  • Li-Wei Liu
  • Yulan Yuan
  • Han-Hsiung Liao

Abstract

Tourists show an increasing interest in locally produced food items and bring them home as souvenirs. Despite a few discussions about food souvenirs, no research addresses how to evaluate the product quality from the consumer-based perceptual/evaluative perspective. In this study, the authors present a complete process for conceptualizing and operationalizing a formative second-order construct for food souvenir quality including a thorough literature review, one qualitative study and two quantitative studies. The model comprises nine dimensions: production specification, sensual appeals, packaging, word-of-mouth, price, brand, history/tradition, award/certification and food safety & health – measured by 16 formative indicators in total. Consumers identify dimensional indicators using paper-based surveys. Structural equation modelling examines linkages between the perceived quality and outcome measures (perceived value and purchase intention). Data collected from 611 consumers show that the resulting model performs well. The model also satisfies the criteria for evaluating formative indexes. Another sample consisting of 486 respondents cross-validates the findings. The study develops a robust measure across multiple food souvenir consumption contexts. The proposed model is an easy-to-use tool to assess the effect of quality dimensions/indicators and enables managers to determine how resources should be allocated to improve quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaang-Iuan Ho & Li-Wei Liu & Yulan Yuan & Han-Hsiung Liao, 2021. "Perceived food souvenir quality as a formative second-order construct: how do tourists evaluate the quality of food souvenirs?," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 479-502, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:4:p:479-502
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1715928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1715928
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1715928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:4:p:479-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.