IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i13p1918-1929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Humpback whale encounters: encouraging pro-environmental behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Rosie Hoberg
  • Lee Kannis-Dymand
  • Kate Mulgrew
  • Vikki Schaffer
  • Eleanor Clark

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of whale encounters on tourists’ pro-environmental intentions, and possible influences of individual characteristics. Data were collected from whale watching/swim-with-whale experiences within Australia and the Kingdom of Tonga. Comparison of pre and post trip survey data (N = 267) indicated that engaging and reflecting during the experience was positively associated with pro-environmental intentions following the encounter. However, tourists who reportedly lacked mutualistic values, displayed a low awareness of consequences, or adopted non-nature-based tourism motivations were less likely to engage and reflect. Therefore, tour operators should aim to facilitate cognitive and affective processing during wildlife encounters, especially for groups that are less likely to engage as this could both increase experience satisfaction and the potential for attitude and behaviour change. Further exploration of these complex relationships and their application are recommended to maximize environmental protection efforts while minimizing the ecological impacts of wildlife tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosie Hoberg & Lee Kannis-Dymand & Kate Mulgrew & Vikki Schaffer & Eleanor Clark, 2021. "Humpback whale encounters: encouraging pro-environmental behaviours," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1918-1929, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1918-1929
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1808597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1808597
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1808597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1918-1929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.