IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i13p1856-1879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ex-ante evaluation of marketing policies to improve itinerary service

Author

Listed:
  • Tsung-Hsien Tsai
  • Chien-Min Chen

Abstract

Tourism activities derived from specific themes are getting popular in the market; nevertheless, extant or novel service content in the itinerary is not always appreciated by tourists. This study aims to propose an analytic tool for evaluating prospective policies so that tourism operators can expect potential effects before official implementation. A stated-preference experiment is utilized to explore tourists’ responses given various scenarios. Eight potential attributes including theme explanation, destination authenticity, activities, events, souvenirs, gastronomy delight, length of itinerary, and monetary cost are examined using Chinese ancient scholar/scholarship as an example. The collected responses are analysed via logit-based choice models. The modelling results show that the latent class model with three segmented groups is capable of explaining respondents’ choices. Each segment of respondents has shown distinct preferences toward the service attributes. The constructed model is then applied to conduct ex-ante evaluations. The simulation of choice probabilities reveals positive effects of conducting service improvement, shows necessity to stay ahead in the market, and also indicates trade-off effects if fees are raised.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsung-Hsien Tsai & Chien-Min Chen, 2021. "An ex-ante evaluation of marketing policies to improve itinerary service," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1856-1879, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1856-1879
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1806792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1806792
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1806792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1856-1879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.