IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i11p1561-1575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring authenticity through spatial metaphors: How close are tourists to the back regions?

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Chiang Lin

Abstract

From a postmodernist point of view, the concept of authenticity varies among tourists, time, and heritage sites, and it cannot be easily measured using traditional scales. This research used the method of spatial metaphors to propose an Inclusion of Authenticity in Experience scale (IAE). Study 1 used a small sample size and a repetitive time measurement. Study 2 expanded the sample size. Study 3 changed the study area. The research tested the scale’s internal-consistency reliability and test–retest reliability, and used relevant scales to test face, concurrent, predictive, and discriminant validity. The end of this paper presents a discussion and a comparison of these three studies with previous studies to show that the IAE has good psychometric qualities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Chiang Lin, 2021. "Measuring authenticity through spatial metaphors: How close are tourists to the back regions?," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1561-1575, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:11:p:1561-1575
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1815668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1815668
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1815668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:11:p:1561-1575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.