IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i10p1389-1401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Been there, done that: quasi-experimental evidence about how, why, and for who, a previous visit might increase stopover destination loyalty

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Pike
  • Filareti Kotsi
  • Frank Mathmann
  • Di Wang

Abstract

Despite stopovers being a part of long-haul air travel since commercial flights commenced over 80 years ago, the first published research on the phenomenon did not appear until 2016. Also, even though destination image has been the most researched construct in the destination marketing literature, no studies had measured perceptions of a destination in the context of a stopover until 2018. This study makes a contribution to this emerging research field by reporting how a quasi-experimental design found previous visitation enhances destination image and destination loyalty in the context of a stopover during long haul international air travel. However, this effect was weakened for individuals high in prevention focus. Conceptually, the research design is underpinned by Regulatory Focus Theory, which has rarely been reported in the destination marketing literature. The results have practical implications, for Dubai as a stopover destination, and for other destination marketing organizations responsible for emerging destinations or destinations in regions that have experienced negative publicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Pike & Filareti Kotsi & Frank Mathmann & Di Wang, 2021. "Been there, done that: quasi-experimental evidence about how, why, and for who, a previous visit might increase stopover destination loyalty," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1389-1401, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:10:p:1389-1401
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1792854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1792854
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1792854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:10:p:1389-1401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.