IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v23y2020i4p438-451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial discrimination in tourism: the case of African-American travellers in South Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Hudson
  • Kevin Kam Fung So
  • Fang Meng
  • David Cárdenas
  • Jing Li

Abstract

African-American tourists are one of the fast-growing segments of the travel sector, but very little is known about this consumer group. What we do know from previous research is that African-American travellers are different to travellers in general, and their travel decisions are closely related with their feelings of welcome and racial acceptance. This study employed a mixed method approach in order to explore issues of racial acceptance in South Carolina, two years after removal of the Confederate flag from state capitol grounds. The results of both qualitative and quantitative research show that the fear of racial discrimination is still a key barrier preventing African-American tourists from visiting and enjoying their vacations in South Carolina. Eradicating such racial discrimination in tourism is a formidable task, but not unsurmountable, and the final section of the paper makes recommendations for establishing a programme to do so.Highlights African-American tourists are one of the fast-growing segments of the travel sectorTheir travel decisions are closely related with their feelings of welcome and racial acceptanceThe study employed a mixed method approach in order to explore issues of racial acceptanceThe results show that the fear of racial discrimination is still a key barrier preventing African-American tourists from visiting and enjoying their vacationsEradicating such racial discrimination in tourism is a formidable task but not unsurmountable

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Hudson & Kevin Kam Fung So & Fang Meng & David Cárdenas & Jing Li, 2020. "Racial discrimination in tourism: the case of African-American travellers in South Carolina," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 438-451, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:4:p:438-451
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2018.1516743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2018.1516743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2018.1516743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:4:p:438-451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.