IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v23y2020i20p2492-2502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring perceived beauty of the Great Barrier Reef using eye-tracking technology

Author

Listed:
  • Noel Scott
  • Dung Le
  • Susanne Becken
  • Rod M. Connolly

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to test the usefulness of eye-tracking in measuring the perceived beauty of photos of the Great Barrier Reef. Eye-tracking is used to measure visual attention (fixation count, fixation duration) to 21 photos ranked in the degree of perceived beauty. Results indicate significant differences in visual attention to ‘beautiful’ and ‘ugly’ photos and a significant correlation between average perceived beauty and attention measures. This study provides evidence that eye-tracking can be used to measure the relative perceived beauty of natural images reflecting the attention given to ‘attractive’ images.

Suggested Citation

  • Noel Scott & Dung Le & Susanne Becken & Rod M. Connolly, 2020. "Measuring perceived beauty of the Great Barrier Reef using eye-tracking technology," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(20), pages 2492-2502, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:20:p:2492-2502
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1626812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2019.1626812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2019.1626812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirillova, Ksenia, 2023. "A review of aesthetics research in tourism:," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:20:p:2492-2502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.