IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v23y2020i19p2440-2460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment valuation of natural tourist attractions under the uncertainty of multiple unexpected events: an ROV method

Author

Listed:
  • Chunfan Guo
  • Xiang Huang
  • Fansheng Jia

Abstract

This study applies the real options valuation (ROV) method with a jump process to consider the uncertainty of multiple unexpected events (UEs) when building investment valuation models for natural tourist attractions (NTAs). Unlike previous studies, this investigation considers multiple UEs from a pre-events, micro-level perspective. In considering both homogeneous and heterogeneous UE scenarios, certain conclusions can be drawn, so long as the project value of an NTA is known. In assessing diverse scenarios, it can be generally predicted that the greater the UE effects, the higher the degree of uncertainty; also, the more extensive the damage caused by UEs and the more frequent their occurrence, the greater the expense of an investment opportunity, and the longer the wait until the optimal time for investment. In assessing both homogeneous and heterogeneous UE scenarios, this study finds that investments should be valued differently under each type of scenario. In determining the optimal time to invest in NTAs that face differing types of UEs, strategic delay is found to be advantageous in many cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunfan Guo & Xiang Huang & Fansheng Jia, 2020. "Investment valuation of natural tourist attractions under the uncertainty of multiple unexpected events: an ROV method," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(19), pages 2440-2460, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:19:p:2440-2460
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1637402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2019.1637402
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2019.1637402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:19:p:2440-2460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.