IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v23y2020i19p2428-2439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dark tourism discipline: a creative brand in a competitive academic environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Sibonakaliso Shadrack Nhlabathi
  • Brij Maharaj

Abstract

This paper emerged from a PhD research project which investigated motivations to tour dark tourism sites, particularly those in South Africa as well as internationally. Like previous studies, the theory that fascination with something ‘dark’ in tourism, underpinned that research project. Literature showed that the ‘dark’ valance of dark tourism evolved from ancient morbid spectacles such as public gladiatorial contests, public executions, guided tours of morgues and early Christian pilgrimages. Thus, when the ‘dark tourism’ discipline emerged (1990s), it was based on the theory of fascination with suffering. However, the results of the motivations to engage in dark tourism study showed that the desire to learn and to pay homage to victims of past atrocities motivated these tours. This refuted the original theory. Thus, follow-up excavation led to the conclusion that neoliberalism was at the bottom of the dark tourism discipline. When neoliberalism became a dominant economic organizing system (1980s), it presented fertile ground for the dark tourism discipline to take root in higher education. Owing to neoliberalism, during the 1990s, higher education institutions experienced state funding cuts, this compelled them to be entrepreneurial to survive. The dark tourism scholarship, consequently, emerged as part of corporatization of higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Sibonakaliso Shadrack Nhlabathi & Brij Maharaj, 2020. "The dark tourism discipline: a creative brand in a competitive academic environment?," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(19), pages 2428-2439, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:19:p:2428-2439
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1636770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2019.1636770
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2019.1636770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:19:p:2428-2439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.