IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v23y2020i17p2098-2102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism value assessment model of ‘UNESCO-listed’ monasteries: Kosovo and Metohija

Author

Listed:
  • Dušan Ristić
  • Danijela Vukoičić
  • Milena Nikolić
  • Sanja Božović
  • Miroljub Milinčić

Abstract

In this study, a tourism value assessment of the monasteries in Kosovo and Metohija, which are inscribed on the UNESCO List of World Heritage in Danger. The applied model consists of two groups of indicators (resource values and state of development) and seven sub-indicators, which were ranked and evaluated by respondents on site. The aim of the study is to assess and highlight the tourist values and potentials that could contribute to marketing, point out the shortcomings and opportunities for further development and protection. The model was first applied for the valorization of the monastery, which due to the lack of legal protection, governance and political insecurity can become the subject of research performed by experts from various fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Dušan Ristić & Danijela Vukoičić & Milena Nikolić & Sanja Božović & Miroljub Milinčić, 2020. "Tourism value assessment model of ‘UNESCO-listed’ monasteries: Kosovo and Metohija," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(17), pages 2098-2102, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:17:p:2098-2102
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1622657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2019.1622657
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2019.1622657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding He & Jingchong Hu & Jie Zhang, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainable Development Suitability in Linear Cultural Heritage—A Case of Beijing Great Wall Cultural Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Dušan Ristić & Danijela Vukoičić & Marko Ivanović & Milena Nikolić & Nikola Milentijević & Ljiljana Mihajlović & Dragan Petrović, 2024. "Transformation of Abandoned Railways into Tourist Itineraries/Routes: Model of Revitalization of Marginal Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:17:p:2098-2102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.