IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v20y2017i7p759-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slopeland disaster risk management in tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Chung-Hung Tsai
  • Shu-Chuan LinLiu

Abstract

Complex disasters have received greater attention because of the earthquake that struck Japan on 2011. Taiwan is not only in a region in which various disasters occur frequently, but because of its complex geological and topographical conditions plus overdevelopment of sensitive areas caused by rapid expansion of the tourism industry, many tourist areas are under direct threat, increasing the risk of safety of human life and impacting the overall economic development to a greater extent. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of complex disasters on the tourism industry in Taiwan. Using slopeland disasters as an example and employing the concepts of modern risk management, the study aims to strengthen and integrate relevant research results and techniques, such as analysis of potential disasters, analysis of structural vulnerability, and analysis of aggregate loss probability. The study provides suggestions related to complex disaster assessment patterns and management strategies in the tourism industry. It is expected that relevant information and results of the risk assessment analysis presented in this work not only benefits government departments, tourist facilities’ owners, insurance companies, and financial institutions, but also assists in effective management of risk stemming from natural disasters in relation to the tourism industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung-Hung Tsai & Shu-Chuan LinLiu, 2017. "Slopeland disaster risk management in tourism," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 759-786, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:20:y:2017:i:7:p:759-786
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2016.1165187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2016.1165187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2016.1165187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:20:y:2017:i:7:p:759-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.