IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v18y2015i1p83-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘To participate or not to participate?’ A reflective account

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Mura

Abstract

Discussions about ethics are often based on whether and how the research affects the physical and psychological well-being of the participants of the study. However, too often discussions concerning the safety and well-being of the researcher are overlooked by tourism scholars. This paper is a reflective account of the ethical dilemmas that I, as a researcher, had to face during an ethnographic fieldwork conducted in 2007 on the party island of Ios, Greece, with the intent to explore risk-taking behaviour and perceptions of fear among young holidaymakers. Since binge drinking and drug consumption were common activities among the young tourists, I was at risk of being physically and psychologically harmed. As a result, I had to deal with ethical dilemmas during and after the fieldwork. Overall, this paper's contribution to our knowledge is threefold. First, as a reflective exercise, this paper contributes to the ongoing debate on reflexivity in tourism research. Second, it advances our knowledge concerning ethics in tourism. Third, it allows us to have a better understanding of the relationship between research ethics and reflexivity, which has been relatively neglected by tourism scholars.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Mura, 2015. "‘To participate or not to participate?’ A reflective account," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 83-98, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:83-98
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2013.790879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2013.790879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2013.790879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:83-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.