IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcejxx/v3y2010i3p313-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of prepayment risks in China's mortgage-backed securitization

Author

Listed:
  • Ho-Mou Wu
  • Changrong Deng

Abstract

Prepayment decisions bring risks to the process of mortgage-backed securitization (MBS) and make pricing of these assets difficult. With data from a Chinese bank's mortgage-backed security pool, we examine prepayment decisions of the borrowers. Since multiple prepayments are allowed without penalty in China, we also distinguish between the probability and the proportion of prepayment. With discrete choice models and a Type II Tobit model, we conclude that the probability of prepayment is affected by the starting account balance, monthly effects, duration, term of debt, house type, trading type of loan, house value and size of mortgage. The probability is also affected by individual factors, including gender, age, education level, individual income and family income. Interestingly, the female borrowers are more likely to prepay, while older borrowers intend to prepay a fewer number of times but with a larger amount each time. In addition, similar factors as above are also shown to explain the choices of proportions of prepayment, with some reasonable adjustments. Our results imply that the variations in income, expenditure, geographic difference and opportunities in the financial market should be included for consideration of risk in the MBS process in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho-Mou Wu & Changrong Deng, 2010. "A study of prepayment risks in China's mortgage-backed securitization," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 313-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:313-326
    DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2010.562047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17538963.2010.562047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17538963.2010.562047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:313-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.