IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rbalxx/v55y2024i2p271-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lithuanians’ perception of terrorism: are Muslims “folk devils” for Lithuanians?

Author

Listed:
  • Gintarė Sereikaitė Motiejūnė

Abstract

A considerable amount of research in Western countries during the past 30 years has found a strong tendency to associate Muslims with violent acts. This has resulted in an increase in Islamophobia. This article examines Lithuania’s media, politicians, and public perceptions on terrorism-Muslims in order to understand the correlation between Lithuanian media and political discourse on Muslims and their connection with public discourses. I propose that the weaker the linkage between media and political portrayals associating terrorism with Muslims is with public perceptions of terrorism and Muslims, the less likely the latter will see Muslims as folk devils. My analysis of the data supports this hypothesis and conclusively shows that media and political discourse do not have a hegemonic power to control the portrayal of Muslims and to create a sense of moral panic among Lithuanians.

Suggested Citation

  • Gintarė Sereikaitė Motiejūnė, 2024. "Lithuanians’ perception of terrorism: are Muslims “folk devils” for Lithuanians?," Journal of Baltic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 271-289, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rbalxx:v:55:y:2024:i:2:p:271-289
    DOI: 10.1080/01629778.2023.2220299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01629778.2023.2220299
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01629778.2023.2220299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rbalxx:v:55:y:2024:i:2:p:271-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rbal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.