IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rajsxx/v8y2016i2p178-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities in scholarly knowledge: Public value failures and their impact on global science

Author

Listed:
  • Thema Monroe-White
  • Thomas S. Woodson

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature that acknowledges the overall trends in publication patterns in the least economically advantaged countries. The pattern shows that there are disparities between the Global North and Global South with regard to indexed publication output. Few studies, however, empirically assess the impact that this systematic disparity has on global scientific knowledge. This paper examines this systematic disparity by (1) analysing the co-authorship patterns of the least economically advantaged countries using bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science ISI database, and (2) applying the public-value failure mapping tool to identify potential failures in the scientific scholarship. Our analysis provides strong evidence of public value failures in global scholarly publication output. The paper contributes to the science policy and public value failure literatures using novel theoretical and methodological approaches to explore issues of equity and inequality in global science.

Suggested Citation

  • Thema Monroe-White & Thomas S. Woodson, 2016. "Inequalities in scholarly knowledge: Public value failures and their impact on global science," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 178-186, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:178-186
    DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2016.1147204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20421338.2016.1147204
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20421338.2016.1147204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:178-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.