Author
Listed:
- Kazeem A Adebiyi
- Olasunkanmi O Akinyemi
- Egunleti O Adeleye
Abstract
It has always been a concern to most airline operators why their aircraft are on the ground despite all the resources being incurred on maintenance. It is the main goal of this study to evaluate the performance of an airline maintenance programme. Primary data were sourced from the maintenance department of a local airline operator while the secondary data were sourced from aviation journals and statutory regulatory provisions respectively. The information obtained was quantitatively analysed according to maintenance practice factor (MPF), maintenance practice contribution (MPC) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Maintenance practices analysed were; visual inspection, servicing, lubrication, cleaning and checking. Cleaning had the highest maintenance practice with a mean MPF of 95.3%. Scheduled maintenance method had the highest contribution of use with a mean MPC of 100%, showing how effective it is. The AHP revealed that the Logistics and Planning elements of the maintenance programme contribute more to the success of the maintenance programme with a contribution of value for money of 26.1%. The consistency ratios indicate consistency in the judgments obtained from experts in the maintenance department. To have aircraft that are ready to fly, emphasis should be placed on the effectiveness and efficiency of the Logistics and Planning activities of the airline’s maintenance department.
Suggested Citation
Kazeem A Adebiyi & Olasunkanmi O Akinyemi & Egunleti O Adeleye, 2016.
"Multi-criteria performance evaluation of an airline maintenance programme – A case study,"
African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 79-87, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:79-87
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2015.1132538
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:79-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.