Author
Listed:
- Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa
- Afrane Baffour Kyei
- Isaac Akurugu Apike
- Dadson Awunyo-Vitor
- Raymond K. Dziwornu
Abstract
This study examined the perception and adoption of artificial pollination among cocoa farmers in Ghana. It used cross-sectional data collected from 206 cocoa farmers selected through multi-stage sampling technique. Descriptive statistics, Likert Scale and the Tobit regression model were the methods of analysis. With an adoption rate of 49%, the study revealed that cocoa farmers have a positive perception towards adoption of artificial pollination technology. The results also showed that age of farmer, extension visits, yield and household size have significant positive effects on the probability of adoption of artificial pollination among cocoa farmers, whereas farm size has a significant negative effect on adoption. Leveraging on the positive perception generated, we encourage extension agents to sensitize farmers on the importance of artificial pollination through continuous awareness creation and promotion of the benefits of adopting the technology. Furthermore, given cocoa farmers’ positive perception on artificial pollination, Ghana’s cocoa production and marketing regulatory body (COCOBOD) should take steps in implementing the technology. Implementers of this technology should also target younger farmers since age has a negative influence on adoption of artificial pollination. Finally, this paper contributes to the literature by focusing on the perception and the factors that influence adoption of artificial pollination in cocoa production which currently has not been researched and documented in the cocoa production literature.
Suggested Citation
Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa & Afrane Baffour Kyei & Isaac Akurugu Apike & Dadson Awunyo-Vitor & Raymond K. Dziwornu, 2022.
"Perception and adoption of artificial pollination technology in cocoa production: Evidence from Ghana,"
African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 1642-1654, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:1642-1654
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2021.1977089
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:1642-1654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.