Author
Listed:
- Lindiwe Ngcobo
- Ajuruchukwu Obi
- Sampson Mamphweli
- Siphe Zantsi
Abstract
Renewable energies, which include biogas, have been identified as a possible panacea for the energy challenges faced by the poor and can potentially ensure that they obtain cheaper energy that is more accessible and environmentally sustainable. However, its adoption and use has been limited despite the important trade-offs it offers to rural households. Literature on agricultural innovations show that perceptions have an impact on decision-making in respect of adoption of new technology, and biogas is no exception. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of systematic studies on the adoption and perception of biogas. This study aimed to assess the use and perceptions of biogas among rural farming households and identify factors affecting adoption of biogas digesters. A cross-sectional survey of 48 households, randomly selected from Melani village, was conducted. Descriptive statistics and the Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) model were employed to address the study objectives. Descriptive statistics showed remarkable disparities between biogas adopters and non-adopters. Findings from the BLR show that age has a negative influence on biogas adoption, whilst employment status, land size and education have positive impacts on biogas adoption. Information on the economic benefits of low cost biogas should be accessible to rural households. We recommended that rural households be made aware of biogas digesters and the design of small-scale rural biogas policies take cognisance of the socio-economic characteristics of biogas adopters.
Suggested Citation
Lindiwe Ngcobo & Ajuruchukwu Obi & Sampson Mamphweli & Siphe Zantsi, 2022.
"Adoption and perceptions of biogas: Empirical evidence from rural households of Melani village in Raymond Mhlaba municipality,"
African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 350-358, February.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:350-358
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2020.1819684
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:350-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.