Author
Listed:
- Sibonelo Zwane
- Stuart R. D. Ferrer
Abstract
The South African avocado industry has experienced a major decline in its export performance which could be attributed to its overall competitiveness in the global export markets. This study seeks to analyse the competitiveness of the South African avocado industry based on the perceptions of the industry participants and other industry experts. The main purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive statement on the competitiveness of this industry for strategic planning by agribusiness managers and other key stakeholders to improve the industry’s competitiveness. A five-step analytical framework previously used in similar studies is applied to measure and analyse the competitive performance of the South African avocado industry. Through engagements with industry participants and experts, 90 factors that influence the competitiveness of the South African avocado industry were identified. An analysis of these factors using Porter’s Determinants of Competitiveness approach supported by measurements of comparative advantage using trade measures such as the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), Relative Trade Advantage (RTA), Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA), Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage (NRCA) and Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), this study was able to establish that the South African avocado industry is experiencing competitiveness challenges. Climate change, competition in the international markets, and various South African policies were identified as major constraints for the competitiveness of the South African avocado industry. Thirteen strategic actions that could be used to improve the competitiveness of this industry are recommended. The study mainly focused on the South African avocado industry; thus, generalisations should be cautious.
Suggested Citation
Sibonelo Zwane & Stuart R. D. Ferrer, 2024.
"Competitiveness analysis of the South African avocado industry,"
Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(4), pages 277-302, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:ragrxx:v:63:y:2024:i:4:p:277-302
DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2024.2416233
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ragrxx:v:63:y:2024:i:4:p:277-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ragr20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.