IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raflxx/v4y2008i5p331-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the general elections and long memory: evidence from the London Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Cheah Eng Tuck
  • Lee Yoong Hon

Abstract

The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) in the weak-form requires that there is no serial correlation between the returns at different times and successive price changes. On the contrary, stock returns displaying statistically significant autocorrelation between observations widely separated in time, or long memory, would weaken the properties derived from martingale models for pricing derivatives and other financial assets. Using spectral regression method, the fractional differencing parameter is estimated using 522 trading days (2 years post-UK general election day) in the London Stock Exchange (LSE). Evidence suggests that, regardless of the political party forming the government and consistent with findings for major capital markets, there is no evidence to suggest that the market is inefficient in the weak form of the efficient market hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheah Eng Tuck & Lee Yoong Hon, 2008. "A note on the general elections and long memory: evidence from the London Stock Exchange," Applied Financial Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(5), pages 331-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raflxx:v:4:y:2008:i:5:p:331-335
    DOI: 10.1080/17446540701720659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17446540701720659
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17446540701720659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raflxx:v:4:y:2008:i:5:p:331-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rafl20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.