IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v115y2025i3p499-512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Posthuman Cartography? Rethinking Artificial Intelligence, Cartographic Practices, and Reflexivity

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Lin
  • Bo Zhao

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is catalyzing growing disruptions in contemporary cartography and beyond. Unlike previous mapping technologies, the current wave of AI enables producing maps without explicit programmed rules, which extends and, in some cases, surpasses human intelligence. This transformative capacity has the potential to reshape not only the practices of map-making but also the power structures of the actors involved. In this light, we propose posthuman cartography as a potential perspective to examine the emerging trend in cartography characterized by a codependency between human and machine intelligences. This theoretical perspective challenges traditional human-centric approaches, proposing instead to view mapping as a network of relations that include both human and nonhuman actors. It also highlights the importance of recognizing AI as significant actors in mapping praxes, as well as the need to acknowledge the shifting power structures influenced by AI. We further advocate for a reflexive approach that tackles the ethical challenges posed by AI and other technological disruptions in contemporary cartography.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Lin & Bo Zhao, 2025. "Posthuman Cartography? Rethinking Artificial Intelligence, Cartographic Practices, and Reflexivity," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(3), pages 499-512, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:115:y:2025:i:3:p:499-512
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2024.2435920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2024.2435920
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2024.2435920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:115:y:2025:i:3:p:499-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.