IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v114y2024i7p1483-1504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do In-Car Navigation Aids Impair Expert Navigators’ Spatial Learning Ability?

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Ying
  • Weihua Dong
  • Sara Irina Fabrikant

Abstract

Reliance on digital navigation aids has already shown negative impacts on navigators’ innate spatial abilities. How this happens is still an open research question. We report on an empirical study with twenty-four experienced (male) taxi drivers to evaluate the long-term impacts of in-car navigation system use on the spatial learning ability of these navigation experts. Specifically, we measured cognitive load by means of electroencephalography (EEG) coupled with eye tracking to assess their visuospatial attention allocation during a video-based route-following task while driving through an unknown urban environment. We found that long-term reliance on in-car navigation aids did not affect participants’ visual attention allocation during spatial learning but rather limited their ability to encode viewed geographic information into memory, which, in turn, led to greater cognitive load, especially along route segments between intersections. Participants with greater dependence on in-car navigation aids performed worse on the spatial knowledge tests. Our combined behavioral and neuropsychological findings provide evidence for the impairment of expert navigators’ spatial learning ability when exposed to long-term use of digital in-car navigation aids.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Ying & Weihua Dong & Sara Irina Fabrikant, 2024. "How Do In-Car Navigation Aids Impair Expert Navigators’ Spatial Learning Ability?," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(7), pages 1483-1504, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:114:y:2024:i:7:p:1483-1504
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2024.2356858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2024.2356858
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2024.2356858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:114:y:2024:i:7:p:1483-1504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.