Author
Listed:
- Yasong Guo
- Luoma Wan
- Hongsheng Zhang
- Yinyi Lin
- Haowen Wang
Abstract
Urban vegetation plays a vital role in developing sustainable cities via essential urban ecoservices. Potential threats, however, from natural disturbances to urban vegetation and its resilience remain unclear at local scales. Taking the super typhoon Mangkhut in 2018 as an example, this study aimed to develop a resilience index to evaluate the impacts of super typhoons on urban vegetation in Hong Kong at the species level. The typhoon impacts and canopy recovery of four tree species were assessed by integrating field and remote sensing data. First, we discussed the specific influencing factors of the typhoon. Second, we constructed a normalized seasonal difference vegetation index (NSDVI) to identify and characterize the distribution of tree species. Then, a seasonal resilience index was developed at the species level to investigate the severity and recovery of the vegetation after the typhoon. The results demonstrated that strong wind was the leading cause of damage. NSDVI improved tree species identification by more than 10 percent compared with conventional methods. In terms of the resilience analysis, 87.25 percent of the trees were affected by the typhoon. Royal palm (Roystonea regia) performed well among the four species during the typhoon, suffering minor losses. A total of 47.95 percent of the trees recovered to their pretyphoon state two years after the typhoon. The recovery speed of Hainan ormosia (Ormosia pinnata) was the fastest. This research provides a scientific reference for the planning of urban vegetation species to increase their resilience and ability to provide ecoservices despite natural disturbances.
Suggested Citation
Yasong Guo & Luoma Wan & Hongsheng Zhang & Yinyi Lin & Haowen Wang, 2022.
"A Seasonal Resilience Index to Evaluate the Impacts of Super Typhoons on Urban Vegetation in Hong Kong,"
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(6), pages 1614-1632, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:6:p:1614-1632
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1989284
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:6:p:1614-1632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.