Author
Listed:
- Xiaoping Shen
- Limin Wang
- Xiulan Zhang
- Jiangmei Liu
- Lijun Wang
- Li Zhu
Abstract
Regional disparities in cancer mortality rates are prevalent at all geographic scales. Area factors such as health conditions, behavior patterns, pollution, and socioeconomic status (SES) have significant impacts on cancer disparity. Efforts to determine the risk factors help to identify interventions that can lower disease burdens. In this study, we focus on liver cancer mortality (LCM), which is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Liver cancer rates have shown significant geographic disparities. We used a comprehensive database and applied innovative statistical models to investigate the influences of area factors on geographic disparities in LCM rates in China. To incorporate the long lag period between exposure and mortality, we integrated databases on LCM, other liver diseases, smoking and alcohol use, pollution, health care resources, censuses, and SES across four decades. Spatial random effect models were developed to address the effects of risk factors. Results showed that higher LCM is linked to less access to and lower availability of medical services and higher levels of water pollution. People in the high LCM area more likely worked in the industrial sector and had higher rates of smoking and alcohol use. Compared to Western countries where populations in high-LCM regions usually were those with the lowest SES, this study revealed that China’s high-LCM areas were the mostly rapidly industrializing regions with higher income, more severe water pollution, and a lack of access to medical services. Study results substantially inform potential policy on the allocation of resources for cancer prevention and control in developing countries.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoping Shen & Limin Wang & Xiulan Zhang & Jiangmei Liu & Lijun Wang & Li Zhu, 2022.
"Analysis of Forty Years of Geographic Disparity in Liver Cancer Mortality and the Influence of Risk Factors,"
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(2), pages 563-580, February.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:2:p:563-580
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1919501
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:2:p:563-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.