IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v111y2020i3p889-899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-envisioning the Toxic Sublime: National Park Wilderness Landscapes at the Anthropocene

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas T. Bergmann
  • Robert M. Briwa

Abstract

The Anthropocene concept stimulates much debate among geographers. This wider conversation often neglects the role that visual imagery plays in shaping geographical imaginations of the Anthropocene. This article examines artist Hannah Rothstein’s revisionist collection National Parks 2050 to better understand the intersections of visual imagery and the Anthropocene. Rothstein’s collection draws on Works Progress Administration–style artwork to visualize a bleak future. In particular, her artwork mobilizes the aesthetic of the toxic sublime. To assess National Parks 2050’s use of the toxic sublime, we conducted a visual analysis that found Rothstein’s use of the concept innovative in two important ways. First, Rothstein’s toxic sublime is derived from deeper traditions of the romantic sublime, which diverges from existing understandings of the toxic sublime as the counterpart to a technological sublime. Second, it brings two underexamined themes of the toxic sublime to the fore. The first theme is death and disappearance; the second is scale and the toxic. We argue that Rothstein’s toxic sublime re-instills Burkean sublime’s heightened awareness—here understood as horror and despair—into the romantic natural sublime of U.S. national park wilderness landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas T. Bergmann & Robert M. Briwa, 2020. "Re-envisioning the Toxic Sublime: National Park Wilderness Landscapes at the Anthropocene," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(3), pages 889-899, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:111:y:2020:i:3:p:889-899
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1785835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2020.1785835
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2020.1785835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:111:y:2020:i:3:p:889-899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.