Author
Listed:
- Sheryl Luzzadder-Beach
- Timothy P. Beach
- Nicholas P. Dunning
Abstract
Of multiple ways to assess the geography of the early Anthropocene, three ongoing efforts are establishing the extent, intensity, and chronology of human impacts on landscapes and connecting impacts to global change through greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. Landscapes interact with GHGs, and these have global climate implications. LiDAR, capable of precisely mapping through forest gaps, has revolutionized our ability to characterize and quantify humanized landscapes. In many cases, though, LiDAR is only as good as its accompanying ground verification. This article forges these together to compare a mature literature on wetland contributions to the early Anthropocene in Asia through methane from paddy rice agriculture with the growing literature on a large area of wetland agriculture in the Americas, focusing on the newest discoveries in Central America. Several studies have linked the ∼20 ppm rise in atmospheric CO2 from ∼7000 to 1000 BP with deforestation for global farming; the 100 ppb rise in CH4 from ∼5000 to 1000 BP with wetland farming; and the 7 to 10 ppm decline in CO2 in the sixteenth century CE with reforestation and population collapses of the Americas after the European Conquest. We synthesize the evidence for the onset, duration, and impacts of wetland agriculture in the Maya Lowlands of Mesoamerica to compare their impacts on GHGs and, thus, their contributions to global impacts on climate. This article builds from three decades of studying neotropical humanized landscapes and wetland agroecosystems and more recent quantification from ground-verified LiDAR imagery and synthesizes this growing research and the challenges ahead to gauge the early Anthropocene.
Suggested Citation
Sheryl Luzzadder-Beach & Timothy P. Beach & Nicholas P. Dunning, 2020.
"Wetland Farming and the Early Anthropocene: Globally Upscaling from the Maya Lowlands with LiDAR and Multiproxy Verification,"
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(3), pages 795-807, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:111:y:2020:i:3:p:795-807
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1820310
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:111:y:2020:i:3:p:795-807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.