Author
Listed:
- Francis J. Magilligan
- L. Allan James
- Scott A. Lecce
- James T. Dietrich
- John A. Kupfer
Abstract
The extreme rainfall of October 2015 in South Carolina generated numerous dam failures and spawned the flood of record at most U.S. Geological Survey stream gauges. Detailed field sampling and systematic image analysis are used to document the immediate and sustained geomorphic adjustments at four failed dams within the urbanized Gills Creek watershed. That urban focus is augmented with a similar analysis at five failed dams in more rural settings where less urban infrastructure exists. We also document the magnitude and type of geomorphic adjustments throughout the Gills Creek watershed unrelated to dam failures. Despite the extreme rainfall and associated flooding, the geomorphic effects were limited and localized, manifesting primarily at dam failures but not progressing significantly downstream, especially along Gills Creek, where the combination of intact dams, frequent urban roughness elements, thick floodplain vegetation, and numerous wetlands explains the lack of significant morphologic adjustments or major deposition. Dam failures in rural settings showed greater overbank deposition but the geomorphic effects were still limited to dam proximal locations because of the thick vegetal cover below the dam. Because these dams in rural and urban settings were constructed to maximize waterfront property, low gradient sites were selected; therefore, the geomorphic effects were unlike planned dam removals where massive headcutting, knickpoint migration, and sediment evacuation tend to occur. The most significant effect of the dam failures was the shift from an initial braided channel to a single thread channel within the emptied reservoirs, which occurred quickly, often within the first few months.
Suggested Citation
Francis J. Magilligan & L. Allan James & Scott A. Lecce & James T. Dietrich & John A. Kupfer, 2019.
"Geomorphic Responses to Extreme Rainfall, Catastrophic Flooding, and Dam Failures across an Urban to Rural Landscape,"
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(3), pages 705-729, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:109:y:2019:i:3:p:705-729
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507814
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:109:y:2019:i:3:p:705-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.