IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v108y2018i3p864-883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building a Harmonious Society through Greening: Ecological Civilization and Aesthetic Governmentality in China

Author

Listed:
  • C. P. Pow

Abstract

This article interrogates the shifting governmental logics and planning epistemologies that frame ecological civilization projects in China. The article argues how ecological urban projects such as the eco-city are undergirded by a form of aesthetic governmentality that has been deployed to promote a harmonious society in contemporary China by fusing bourgeois forms of aesthetic environmentalism with world-class urban aesthetics. Drawing on the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city (SSTEC) flagship project, the article first highlights how eco-city construction in China problematizes and targets the urban environment as a legitimate domain of governmental action and argues how the emergence of an eco-aesthetic governmentality signals the shift from a dominant techno-scientific foundation of planning for sustainable cities toward an eco-aesthetic normativity that perpetuates the aestheticization of urban environmental politics in China. To this extent, the article sketches out the emerging contours of the Chinese (eco) aesthetic urban regime that increasingly incorporates aesthetic principles into governmental practices and city planning as a way to manage the problem of urban growth and to promote normative visions of a sustainable urban future in China. Key Words: aesthetics, China, eco-city, governmentality, urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • C. P. Pow, 2018. "Building a Harmonious Society through Greening: Ecological Civilization and Aesthetic Governmentality in China," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(3), pages 864-883, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:108:y:2018:i:3:p:864-883
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1373626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2017.1373626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2017.1373626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:108:y:2018:i:3:p:864-883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.