IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v108y2018i1p226-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Volunteered Geographic Information for Disaster Management and GIScience: A More Complex World of Volunteered Geography

Author

Listed:
  • Billy Tusker Haworth

Abstract

Volunteered geographic information (VGI) refers to changing practices in recent years associated with technological advancements that provide increasing opportunities for private citizens to produce geographic information. VGI activities range from public contributions to online crowdsourced mapping projects to location-related posts on social media sites. These changing practices have important implications for citizens, traditional authoritative systems of geographic knowledge production, and the disciplines of geography and GIScience. One field affected by VGI is disaster management, with numerous studies reporting on the opportunities associated with increased citizen data and involvement in crisis response. There are also significant limitations to the application of VGI, however, notably related to scale, the digital divide, trust, uneven power relations, and adaptability of existing authoritative systems, such as formal emergency management. In this article, these issues and more are critically discussed through examination of three discreet yet related studies of VGI in community bushfire (wildfire) risk reduction in Australia. Although each study has its own unique contributions already published, the collective insight gained by analyzing the studies together provides new and deeper perspectives on critical issues of relevance to both disaster management policies and geography and GIScience. Importantly, the article advocates for greater emphasis on the social aspect of VGI, with citizens mapping and sharing knowledge together, rather than on individual observations and large volumes of data. Further, it raises questions of some of the much-promoted promises of VGI, particularly those that suggest that VGI can allow “everyone” to contribute to geographic knowledge production.

Suggested Citation

  • Billy Tusker Haworth, 2018. "Implications of Volunteered Geographic Information for Disaster Management and GIScience: A More Complex World of Volunteered Geography," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(1), pages 226-240, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:108:y:2018:i:1:p:226-240
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1321979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2017.1321979
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2017.1321979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessia D’Andrea & Patrizia Grifoni & Fernando Ferri, 2022. "Discussing the Role of ICT in Sustainable Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Yan Zhang & Nengcheng Chen & Wenying Du & Shuang Yao & Xiang Zheng, 2020. "A New Geo-Propagation Model of Event Evolution Chain Based on Public Opinion and Epidemic Coupling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Aldo Mascareño & Pablo A. Henríquez & Marco Billi & Gonzalo A. Ruz, 2020. "A Twitter-Lived Red Tide Crisis on Chiloé Island, Chile: What Can Be Obtained for Social-Ecological Research through Social Media Analysis?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-38, October.
    4. Patricia Solís & Jennings Anderson & Sushil Rajagopalan, 2021. "Open geospatial tools for humanitarian data creation, analysis, and learning through the global lens of YouthMappers," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 599-625, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:108:y:2018:i:1:p:226-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.