IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v106y2016i1p114-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reassessing Fortress Conservation? New Media and the Politics of Distinction in Kruger National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Bram Büscher

Abstract

The idea of protected areas as fortress conservation has long been debated and heavily criticized. In practice, however, the paradigm is alive and well and has, in some cases and especially due to rapid increases in poaching, seen major reinforcements. This article contributes to discussions that aim to reassess fortress conservation ideas and practices by analyzing how new online media are changing the politics of access to and control over increasingly militarized protected areas. Focusing on South Africa's Kruger National Park, one of the most iconic and mediated conservation areas globally, this article argues that new media such as online groups, webcams, and mobile phone apps encourage a new politics of social distinction in relation to the park and what it represents. These politics of distinction lead to complex new ways in which the boundaries of “fortress Kruger” are rendered (more) permeable and (more) restrictive at the same time. The article concludes that it is precisely through rendering park boundaries more permeable that new media technologies could help to reinforce the racialized and unequal hierarchies of the social order that fortress conservation was built on.

Suggested Citation

  • Bram Büscher, 2016. "Reassessing Fortress Conservation? New Media and the Politics of Distinction in Kruger National Park," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(1), pages 114-129, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:106:y:2016:i:1:p:114-129
    DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1095061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00045608.2015.1095061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00045608.2015.1095061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:106:y:2016:i:1:p:114-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.