IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raaexx/v31y2024i4p495-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social networks and bond covenants: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Chenyan Liu
  • Juan Chen
  • Hongling Guo
  • Xuemei Qiu

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between managerial social networks and bond covenants by using a sample of Chinese corporate bonds during 2016–2019. We find that firms with higher social network centrality issue corporate bonds with more covenant restrictions. This positive association is amplified in provinces with less developed financial systems and weaker legal protection of creditors. Our results are robust to several robustness tests and endogeneity considerations. Moreover, we examine the mechanisms relating social network centrality to bond covenants. The results show that social networks can reduce the information opacity and strengthen contract enforceability. We also find that the positive association between social network centrality and bond covenants is more pronounced in firms with lower prior but higher current social networks. Finally, this paper shows that the benefits of debt covenants in reducing credit spreads only exist in firms with higher social network centrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenyan Liu & Juan Chen & Hongling Guo & Xuemei Qiu, 2024. "Social networks and bond covenants: evidence from China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 495-520, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:495-520
    DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2023.2222121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/16081625.2023.2222121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/16081625.2023.2222121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:495-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raae20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.