IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raaexx/v26y2019i1-2p108-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A field study of the impact of changes to a net sales-based incentive plan and centralized inventory management

Author

Listed:
  • Hsuan-Lien Chu
  • Yu-Lin Chen
  • Yan-Yi Chiou

Abstract

Although empirical studies have shown an increase in store sales following the implementation of performance-based incentive plans for the salesforce, they rarely consider inventory decisions and do not clarify the consequences of organizational design choices. Using data from 78 retail stores in a case study of a firm’s accounting records from January 2013 to December 2014, this study examines how store managers reacted to changes in (i) performance measurement choices in contracting and (ii) authority over inventory decisions after the mandatory adoption of the International Accounting Standards 2 (IAS 2), which increased the visibility of high inventory costs, and whether the underlying changes improved the gross profit percentage. The case firm switched from a sales-based incentive plan for store managers with a decentralized inventory structure to a net sales-based incentive plan combined with centralized inventory systems. Under the net sales-based incentive plan, store managers can receive bonuses only if losses on inventory valuation were deducted from sales revenue. The empirical evidence shows that performance measurement choices related to salesforce compensation in conjunction with inventory management systems result in increases in a retail store’s gross profits and decreases in losses on inventory valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsuan-Lien Chu & Yu-Lin Chen & Yan-Yi Chiou, 2019. "A field study of the impact of changes to a net sales-based incentive plan and centralized inventory management," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 108-123, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:26:y:2019:i:1-2:p:108-123
    DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2019.1546559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/16081625.2019.1546559
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/16081625.2019.1546559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:26:y:2019:i:1-2:p:108-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raae20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.