IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raaexx/v19y2012i3p278-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the welfare effects of intellectual property rights changes on the Korean pharmaceutical industry: the case of Korea–US Free Trade Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Keun-Yeob Oh
  • Taegi Kim

Abstract

This paper shows how to measure the welfare effects of intellectual property rights (IPR) changes under the Korea–US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on the Korean economy. After the FTA, patent lifetimes are expected to be extended. During such extension periods, Korean generic drug makers will not be able to sell their drugs, and consumers will have to pay more because of higher prices. The new concepts of effective patent term and price-change mechanism were employed, and patent data for the Korean pharmaceutical industry were used to estimate the parameters needed to measure the welfare effects. The empirical results indicate that the welfare effect will be much smaller than suggested by previous studies. These methods to evaluate the welfare effects can be applied to the cases of other recent FTAs and other kinds of IPR negotiations in international economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Keun-Yeob Oh & Taegi Kim, 2012. "Measuring the welfare effects of intellectual property rights changes on the Korean pharmaceutical industry: the case of Korea–US Free Trade Agreement," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 278-291.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:19:y:2012:i:3:p:278-291
    DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2012.667385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/16081625.2012.667385
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/16081625.2012.667385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2000. "The world economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 173(1), pages 3-3, July.
    2. N/A, 2000. "The World Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 173(1), pages 43-65, July.
    3. Fink, Carsten, 2000. "How stronger patent protection in India might affect the behavior of transnational pharaceutical industries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2352, The World Bank.
    4. N/A, 2000. "The world economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 174(1), pages 3-3, October.
    5. N/A, 2000. "The world economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 172(1), pages 3-3, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfons Palangkaraya & Jongsay Yong, 2009. "Parallel Imports, Market Size And Investment Incentive," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 54(02), pages 167-181.
    2. Justin Yifu Lin, 2005. "Viability, Economic Transition and Reflection on Neoclassical Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 239-264, May.
    3. Arias, Fernando & Parra-Amado, Daniel & Garrido, Daira, 2013. "¿Responden los diferentes tipos de flujos de capitales a los mismos fundamentos y en el mismo grado? : evidencia reciente para países emergentes," Chapters, in: Rincón-Castro, Hernán & Velasco, Andrés M. (ed.), Flujos de capitales, choques externos y respuestas de política en países emergentes, chapter 2, pages 53-81, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    4. Changying Li, 2005. "Vertical Product Innovation And Parallel Imports," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 50(01), pages 35-46.
    5. Jianye Liu & Roderic Beaujot, 2002. "Children, Social Assistance and Outcomes: Cross National Comparisons," LIS Working papers 304, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    6. Shinji Takagi & Issei Kozuru, 2010. "Output And Price Linkages In Asia'S Post-Crisis Macroeconomic Interdependence," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 55(01), pages 59-81.
    7. Ronald U. Mendoza, 2013. "Examining The Risk Of Brain Drain And Lower Remittances," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 58(01), pages 1-13.
    8. Giovanni Capannelli & Carlo Filippini, 2010. "Economic Integration In East Asia And Europe: Lessons From A Comparative Analysis," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 55(01), pages 163-184.
    9. Chadha, Alka, 2009. "TRIPs and patenting activity: Evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 499-505, March.
    10. Panle Jia & Pinelopi K. Goldberg & Shubham Chaudhuri, 2006. "Estimating the Effects of Global Patent Protection in Pharmaceuticals: A Case Study of Quinolones in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1477-1514, December.
    11. Carsten Fink, 2001. "Patent Protection, Transnational Corporations, and Market Structure: A Simulation Study of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 101-121, March.
    12. Francesco Laforgia & Fabio Montobbio & Luigi Orsenigo, 2007. "IPRs, technological and industrial development and growth: the case of the pharmaceutical industry," KITeS Working Papers 206, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Oct 2007.
    13. Xuan Li, 2008. "The Impact of Higher Standards in Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical Industries under the TRIPS Agreement: A Comparative Study of China and India," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-36, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Jaya Prakash Pradhan, "undated". "Global competitiveness of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: Trends and Strategies," Working Papers 0605, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID).
    15. Ramesh Govindaraj & Gnanaraj Chellaraj, 2002. "The Indian Pharmaceutical Sector : Issues and Options for Health Sector Reform," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15231.
    16. Anna Rita Bennato & Monica Giulietti, 2019. "Patent policy regulation and public health," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(4), pages 431-457, December.
    17. Padmashree Gehl Sampath, 2010. "Economic Aspects of Access to Medicines after 2005: Product Patent Protection and Emerging Firm Strategies in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry," Working Papers id:3336, eSocialSciences.
    18. Gehl Sampath, Padmashree, 2006. "India's product patent protection regime: Less or more of "pills for the poor"?," MERIT Working Papers 2006-019, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Chadha, Alka, 2009. "Product Cycles, Innovation, and Exports: A Study of Indian Pharmaceuticals," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1478-1483, September.
    20. Lee Branstetter & Raymond Fisman & C. Fritz Foley & Kamal Saggi, 2007. "Intellectual Property Rights, Imitation, and Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence," NBER Working Papers 13033, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:19:y:2012:i:3:p:278-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raae20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.