IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v23y2023i5p843-862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finite difference scheme versus piecewise binomial lattice for interest rates under the skew CEV model

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Menoukeu-Pamen
  • Guangli Xu
  • Xiaoyang Zhuo

Abstract

Interest rates frequently exhibit regulated or controlled characteristics, for example, the prevailing zero interest rate policy, or the leading role of central banks in short rate markets. In order to capture the regulated dynamics of interest rates, we introduce the skew constant-elasticity-of-variance (skew CEV) model. We then propose two numerical approaches: an improved finite difference scheme and a piecewise binomial lattice to evaluate bonds and European/American bond options. Numerical simulations show that both of these two approaches are efficient and satisfactory, with the finite difference scheme being more superior.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Menoukeu-Pamen & Guangli Xu & Xiaoyang Zhuo, 2023. "Finite difference scheme versus piecewise binomial lattice for interest rates under the skew CEV model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 843-862, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:23:y:2023:i:5:p:843-862
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2023.2174040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2023.2174040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2023.2174040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:23:y:2023:i:5:p:843-862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.