Author
Listed:
- Nikolay Gudkov
- Jonathan Ziveyi
Abstract
Fourier transforms provide versatile techniques for pricing financial derivative securities. In applying such techniques, a typical derivative valuation expression is often written as an inner product of the Fourier transform of payoff and the characteristic function of the underlying asset dynamics. Some modelling specifications imply that it might be challenging to find a closed-form expression for the characteristic function. In such situations, numerical approximations have to be employed. This paper utilises the power series approximation technique in finding explicit expressions of the characteristic function for the underlying stochastic variables. We analyse the convergence and accuracy of this technique in the context of valuing European style options written on underlying securities whose dynamics evolve under the influence of multiple Heston-type stochastic volatilities [Heston, S., A closed-form solution for options with Stochastic volatility with applications to Bond and currency options. Rev. Financ. Stud., 1993, 6, 327–343] and Cox–Ingersoll–Ross stochastic interest rates [Cox, J., Ingerson, J. and Ross, S., A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica, 1985, 53, 385–407]. This paper contributes to the existing literature four-fold by: (i) adapting the valuation technique to long-dated instruments; (ii) providing an adjustment to a series of points around which the power series expansion is performed; (iii) analysing the performance of different strategies for hedging European call options; (iv) applying the power series approach to the valuation of guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit riders embedded in variable annuity contracts. Our results demonstrate a high computational efficiency of the power series approximation method for evaluation of derivative prices and hedge ratios.
Suggested Citation
Nikolay Gudkov & Jonathan Ziveyi, 2021.
"Application of power series approximation techniques to valuation of European style options,"
Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 609-635, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:quantf:v:21:y:2021:i:4:p:609-635
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2020.1809696
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:21:y:2021:i:4:p:609-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.