IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v17y2017i12p1923-1932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network reconstruction with UK CDS trade repository data

Author

Listed:
  • William Abel
  • Laura Silvestri

Abstract

Despite post-crisis reforms in over-the-counter derivatives markets, regulators are left with incomplete, but still improved, data-sets. This means that methods for reconstructing networks of bilateral exposures from incomplete data are still necessary to conduct a proper assessment of systemic risk. In this paper, we propose a modification of the network reconstruction method developed by Cont and Moussa that includes additional information which is now available to regulators through post-crisis reforms. By making use of a data-set containing all transactions on UK single name CDS contracts, we assess the suitability of the proposed methodology by examining the characteristics of reconstructed and real networks. We find that the proposed methodology allows us to reconstruct networks that both comply with the newly available information, and are as heterogeneous and sparse with fat tailed in- and out- degree distributions as the real ones.

Suggested Citation

  • William Abel & Laura Silvestri, 2017. "Network reconstruction with UK CDS trade repository data," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(12), pages 1923-1932, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:17:y:2017:i:12:p:1923-1932
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1357975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2017.1357975
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2017.1357975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edson Bastos Santos & Rama Cont, 2010. "The Brazilian Interbank Network Structure and Systemic Risk," Working Papers Series 219, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brunetti, Celso & Harris, Jeffrey H. & Mankad, Shawn, 2023. "Networks, interconnectedness, and interbank information asymmetry," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Wang, Haibo, 2024. "Assessing resilience to systemic risks across interbank credit networks using linkage-leverage analysis: Evidence from Japan," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Celso Brunetti & Jeffrey H. Harris & Shawn Mankad, 2021. "Liquidity Networks, Interconnectedness, and Interbank Information Asymmetry," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021-017, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    4. Wang, Hu & Li, Shouwei, 2020. "Risk contagion in multilayer network of financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    5. Mallaburn, David & Roberts-Sklar, Matt & Silvestri, Laura, 2019. "Resilience of trading networks: evidence from the sterling corporate bond market," Bank of England working papers 813, Bank of England.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fariba Karimi & Matthias Raddant, 2016. "Cascades in Real Interbank Markets," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 49-66, January.
    2. Kuzubaş, Tolga Umut & Saltoğlu, Burak & Sever, Can, 2016. "Systemic risk and heterogeneous leverage in banking networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 358-375.
    3. Gabrielle Demange, 2018. "Contagion in Financial Networks: A Threat Index," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 955-970, February.
    4. Wang, Wei & Xu, Huifu & Ma, Tiejun, 2023. "Optimal scenario-dependent multivariate shortfall risk measure and its application in risk capital allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 322-347.
    5. Rodrigo César de Castro Miranda & Benjamin Miranda Tabak, 2013. "Contagion Risk within Firm-Bank Bivariate Networks," Working Papers Series 322, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    6. Bussière, Matthieu & Hoerova, Marie & Klaus, Benjamin, 2015. "Commonality in hedge fund returns: Driving factors and implications," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 266-280.
    7. Farmer, J. Doyne & Kleinnijenhuis, Alissa & Nahai-Williamson, Paul & Wetzer, Thom, 2020. "Foundations of system-wide financial stress testing with heterogeneous institutions," INET Oxford Working Papers 2020-14, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    8. Diaz de la Fuente Manuel, 2023. "Análisis de la Topología de las relaciones entre Bancos y Firmas mediante Redes Complejas: comparación del caso de Argentina e Italia," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4647, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    9. Caceres-Santos, Jonnathan & Rodriguez-Martinez, Anahi & Caccioli, Fabio & Martinez-Jaramillo, Serafin, 2020. "Systemic risk and other interdependencies among banks in Bolivia," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    10. C. Gouriéroux & J.‐C. Héam & A. Monfort, 2012. "Bilateral exposures and systemic solvency risk," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(4), pages 1273-1309, November.
    11. Leonidov, A. & Rumyantsev, E., 2013. "Russian Interbank Systemic Risks Assessment from the Network Topology Point of View," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 65-80.
    12. Anand, Kartik & van Lelyveld, Iman & Banai, Ádám & Friedrich, Soeren & Garratt, Rodney & Hałaj, Grzegorz & Fique, Jose & Hansen, Ib & Jaramillo, Serafín Martínez & Lee, Hwayun & Molina-Borboa, José Lu, 2018. "The missing links: A global study on uncovering financial network structures from partial data," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 107-119.
    13. Martin Keller-Ressel & Stephanie Nargang, 2020. "The hyperbolic geometry of financial networks," Papers 2005.00399, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    14. Fabio Caccioli & Thomas A. Catanach & J. Doyne Farmer, 2012. "Heterogeneity, Correlations And Financial Contagion," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(supp0), pages 1-15.
    15. Leonidov, A.V. & Rumyantsev, E.L., 2016. "Default contagion risks in Russian interbank market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 36-48.
    16. Li, Ping & Guo, Yanhong & Meng, Hui, 2022. "The default contagion of contingent convertible bonds in financial network," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    17. Yao, Dongmin & Sun, Rong & Gao, Qiunan, 2022. "The network structure of the China bond market: Characteristics and explanations from trading factors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).
    18. Chen, Yu & Jin, Shuyue & Wang, Xiasi, 2021. "Solvency contagion risk in the Chinese commercial banks’ network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    19. Xu, Runjie & Mi, Chuanmin & Mierzwiak, Rafał & Meng, Runyu, 2020. "Complex network construction of Internet finance risk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    20. Bardoscia, Marco & Barucca, Paolo & Brinley Codd, Adam & Hill, John, 2017. "The decline of solvency contagion risk," Bank of England working papers 662, Bank of England.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:17:y:2017:i:12:p:1923-1932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.