IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v45y2025i1p45-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are credit rating agencies users of government accounting information? Evidence from the sovereign rating process

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Columbano

Abstract

Sovereign governments are regularly evaluated by credit rating agencies (CRAs) that perform an analysis of creditworthiness based on mostly public data. This article shows that the data used by CRAs is mainly drawn from economic and statistical accounts rather than government financial statements. Thus, CRAs cannot be considered users of financial accounting information, at least at the sovereign government level. The evidence also suggests that governmental accounting information is neglected because it lacks the fundamental quality of comparability that CRAs require, given that ratings are ordinal measure of creditworthiness. Unless governments begin producing harmonized financial statements, it is unlikely that CRAs will ever become users of accounting information. Meanwhile, CRAs ground their sovereign rating process on harmonized economic and statistical accounts that are lacking important information on government payables, receivables, contingent liabilities and assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Columbano, 2025. "Are credit rating agencies users of government accounting information? Evidence from the sovereign rating process," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 45-52, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:45-52
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2024.2305677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2024.2305677
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2024.2305677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:45-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.