IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v44y2024i6p533-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating the budget for evidence-informed policy-making: insights from a UK government department

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Shaxson
  • Rick Hood
  • Annette Boaz
  • Brian Head

Abstract

Improving how evidence is used in policy formulation requires a better understanding of organizational processes inside government departments, for example budget management. Government departments need to ensure that such processes simultaneously strengthen robustness in the evidence base, improve alignment of the evidence base with policy priorities and contribute to a more cost-effective use of the evidence budget. This requires a nuanced understanding of who should be accountable for managing which aspects of the evidence budget and how these different lines of accountability play out in terms of their ability to foster formal and informal relationships between the policy cadre and the evidence cadre. In an era of rapid global change and declining public sector resources, the authors’ findings will help researchers and senior officials understand how government departments should manage their evidence budgets to improve evidence use.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Shaxson & Rick Hood & Annette Boaz & Brian Head, 2024. "Negotiating the budget for evidence-informed policy-making: insights from a UK government department," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 533-542, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:44:y:2024:i:6:p:533-542
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2024.2308003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2024.2308003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2024.2308003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:44:y:2024:i:6:p:533-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.