IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v39y2019i3p166-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The price of fear: Estimating the financial cost of bullying and harassment to the NHS in England

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Kline
  • Duncan Lewis

Abstract

Using a spectrum of measures, this paper estimates some of the financial costs of bullying and harassment to the NHS in England. By means of specific impacts resulting from bullying and harassment to staff health, sickness absence costs to the employer, employee turnover, diminished productivity, sickness presenteeism, compensation, litigation and industrial relations costs, we conservatively estimate bullying and harassment to cost the taxpayer £2.281 billion per annum.The evidence in this paper indicates the importance of urgent material engagement to address bullying in the UK NHS. Existing staff surveys fail to capture the types of behaviours often attributable to bullying and this should be a focus to design pertinent interventions. Capturing bystander/witness experiences are undocumented, as are workplace incivilities and staff satisfaction with policy and procedures for tackling bullying. Policy change is vital for accurately capturing the costs of bullying associated with absenteeism, staff replacement, productivity reductions and to use these as mechanisms to manage organizations that fail to address bullying.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Kline & Duncan Lewis, 2019. "The price of fear: Estimating the financial cost of bullying and harassment to the NHS in England," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 166-174, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:39:y:2019:i:3:p:166-174
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1535044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2018.1535044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2018.1535044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:39:y:2019:i:3:p:166-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.