IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v35y2015i1p31-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immature relationships in the new multi-level United Kingdom: perspectives from Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Laura McAllister

Abstract

This paper explores the new multi-level relationships that exist in the UK postdevolution. In focusing on Wales, it uses two case studies to test some key propositions around system weaknesses; namely, poor intelligence and inadequate collaboration and communication between the 'centre' and the devolved nations. The paper suggests that this has resulted in unbalanced relationships and underdeveloped policy learning between the nations of the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura McAllister, 2015. "Immature relationships in the new multi-level United Kingdom: perspectives from Wales," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 31-38, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:35:y:2015:i:1:p:31-38
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2015.986862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2015.986862
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2015.986862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Kay, 2003. "Evaluating Devolution in Wales," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(1), pages 51-66, March.
    2. Paul Cairney, 2011. "The New British Policy Style: From a British to a Scottish Political Tradition?," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 9(2), pages 208-220, May.
    3. Laura McAllister & Adrian Kay, 2010. "Core tensions in Wales's new politics: pluralist trends in a majoritarian system," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 103-108, March.
    4. J. Gordon Murray, 2012. "Debate: Revolutionizing or recycling public procurement policy in the UK?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 165-167, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Loader, 2018. "Small- and medium-sized enterprises and public procurement: A review of the UK coalition government's policies and their impact," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 47-66, February.
    2. Aksel Ersoy, 2016. "The spread of coproduction: How the concept reached the northernmost city in the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(3), pages 410-423, May.
    3. Svidroňová Mária Murray & Meričková Beáta Mikušová & Gondášová Lýdia, 2016. "E-procurement in Contracting-out of Public Goods and Services: Evidence from Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 57-71, June.
    4. Hilton, Shona & Wood, Karen & Patterson, Chris & Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, 2014. "Implications for alcohol minimum unit pricing advocacy: What can we learn for public health from UK newsprint coverage of key claim-makers in the policy debate?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 157-164.
    5. Rhys Andrews & Steve Martin, 2007. "Has Devolution Improved Public Services?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 149-156, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:35:y:2015:i:1:p:31-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.