IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v18y1998i3p51-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Stakeholding: The Case of an NHS Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Miller
  • John Wilson

Abstract

This article considers the significance of stakeholding for an NHS trust. The trust concerned was confronted with significant changes in its environment which posed a threat to its services and, therefore, its contract income. The trust appeared to be in a vulnerable position because it had not given adequate consideration to its relationship with its stakeholders. To establish where the trust needed to improve relations with stakeholders, the article adopts a model drawn from Johnson and Scholes (1993) and presents an analysis of the view of key individuals through the use of structured interviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Miller & John Wilson, 1998. "Perceptions of Stakeholding: The Case of an NHS Trust," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 51-58, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:18:y:1998:i:3:p:51-58
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9302.00127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9302.00127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Corrêa Gomes & Luciana de Oliveira Miranda Gomes, 2007. "Proposing a theoretical framework to investigate the relationships between an organization and its environment," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 11(1), pages 75-96.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:18:y:1998:i:3:p:51-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.