IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v5y2003i3p377-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond public management

Author

Listed:
  • Walter JM Kickert

Abstract

The Netherlands are often considered an excellent example of ‘new public management’ reforms. Especially the ‘Tilburg model’ of management reform that took place in Dutch local government in the mid-1980s has become internationally renowned. In this review of public management reforms that took place in Dutch local and national government during the 1980s and 1990s we will show that managerial reforms were not the only dominant story in the The Netherlands. Dutch administration experienced a shift in frame of reference beyond public management. This review will not concentrate on ‘factual reforms’ but rather on reform ideas. This study departs from the empirical positivist approach where ‘objective facts’ play the central role. There is no one and single ‘objective truth’ about reforms. Managerial reform seemed the dominant story. In ‘reality’ there was a variety of reform ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter JM Kickert, 2003. "Beyond public management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 377-399, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:5:y:2003:i:3:p:377-399
    DOI: 10.1080/1471903032000146955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1471903032000146955
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1471903032000146955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tahir Nisar, 2007. "Risk Management in Public–Private Partnership Contracts," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Silvana Secinaro & Luigi Corvo & Valerio Brescia & Daniel Iannaci, 2019. "Hybrid Organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. de Wit, Fronika & Mourato, João, 2022. "Governing the diverse forest: Polycentric climate governance in the Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:5:y:2003:i:3:p:377-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.