IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v17y2015i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public and Patient Engagement in Commissioning in the English NHS: An idea whose time has come?

Author

Listed:
  • Bob Hudson

Abstract

Public and patient engagement (PPE) has a limited record of achievement in the English National Health Service (NHS), and this has been further complicated by the split between commissioning and providing remits. The passage of the NHS and Social Care Act 2012 has opened up new possibilities for enhancing PPE in the commissioning of health care. This article outlines the new context, describes a conceptual framework for locating different sorts of PPE activity, and provides some practical illustrations. It argues for greater conceptual clarity and clearer understandings on the purpose of PPE as prerequisites to change.

Suggested Citation

  • Bob Hudson, 2015. "Public and Patient Engagement in Commissioning in the English NHS: An idea whose time has come?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.881534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2014.881534
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2014.881534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pam Carter & Mike Dent & Graham Martin, 2019. "Conflicting Logics of Public Relations in the English NHS: A Qualitative Study of Communications and Engagement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 376-393, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.