IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v13y2011i2p189-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiments for Public Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Z. Margetts

Abstract

Although there has been a ‘dramatic drift’ towards experimentation in political science, the methodology remains scarce in public management research. This article considers the potential for the experimental method for public management. It discusses the benefits and costs of an experimental design. It identifies three barriers to the use of experiments distinctive to public management; a stress on realism and practical solutions; a focus on organizations rather than individuals; and ethical and logistical challenges. It re-evaluates these barriers in the light of recent experiments, arguing that experimental approaches should now be added to the toolkit of public management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Z. Margetts, 2011. "Experiments for Public Management Research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 189-208, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:13:y:2011:i:2:p:189-208
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2010.532970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2010.532970
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2010.532970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosanna Nagtegaal & Lars Tummers & Mirko Noordegraaf & Victor Bekkers, 2019. "Nudging healthcare professionals towards evidence-based medicine: A systematic scoping review," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(2).
    2. Cassandra Handan-Nader & Daniel E. Ho & Becky Elias, 2020. "Feasible Policy Evaluation by Design: A Randomized Synthetic Stepped-Wedge Trial of Mandated Disclosure in King County," Evaluation Review, , vol. 44(1), pages 3-50, February.
    3. Susumu Shikano & Michael F Stoffel & Markus Tepe, 2017. "Information accuracy in legislative oversight: Theoretical implications and experimental evidence," Rationality and Society, , vol. 29(2), pages 226-254, May.
    4. Pablo Sanabria & Paula Cuéllar & Alejandra Rodas & Mauricio Astudillo & Sebastián Estrada & Juan Sebastián González, 2016. "Guía de evaluación. ¿Cómo evaluar la efectividad de una política que busque hacer estratégica la gestión del talento humano en el sector público colombiano?," Documentos de trabajo 17668, Escuela de Gobierno - Universidad de los Andes.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:13:y:2011:i:2:p:189-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.