IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v12y2010i3p363-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Diversity of Citizenship and Democracy in Local Public Management Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Liisa Häikiö

Abstract

This article conceptualizes the diversity of citizenship and democracy in urban settings by studying the cultural and discursive structures of local public management reform. The reform in question is founded on the ideas of new public management. It has been suggested that in these kinds of reforms, citizens are transformed into consumers. However, this discursive case study shows that this is a simplistic and narrow view by conceptualizing the ways in which people's positions and democracy are interpreted locally. Definitions of local citizenship and democracy are framed simultaneously by multiple discourses, both local and global, yielding a local mixture of citizenship, consumerism and clientism. Representative, expert, participatory and user democracy are all present in the cultural structures of the plans for local government reform, but discourses that afford powerful positions to local citizens remain marginal. Citizens are not identified as being extensively involved in urban governance practices. A strengthening of political agency requires that diverse positions of local citizens and forms of democracy are considered in relation to each other and in relation to power structures and resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Liisa Häikiö, 2010. "The Diversity of Citizenship and Democracy in Local Public Management Reform," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 363-384, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:363-384
    DOI: 10.1080/14719030903286649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030903286649
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719030903286649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:363-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.