IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oxdevs/v53y2025i1p39-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are cash transfers enough to reduce poverty and inequalities for people with disabilities?: a qualitative study on factors affecting the impact of the disability allowance in the Maldives

Author

Listed:
  • Shaffa Hameed
  • Hannah Kuper
  • Sofoora Kawsar Usman
  • Lena Morgon Banks

Abstract

Cash transfers are frequently used as a policy instrument to reduce poverty and address disability-related costs amongst people with disabilities. Recent evaluations, however, have found that these programmes often only have modest impacts. This study presents qualitative research linked to an impact evaluation in the Maldives, involving interviews with 43 people with disabilities. It highlighted factors that could affect the effectiveness of the Disability Allowance: the value of the cash transfer was insufficient to cover both basic needs and disability-related goods and services; many adult recipients lacked control over the allowance and how it was spent; many recipients were not referred to complementary programmes that could cover some extra costs; poor availability and quality of needed goods and services; and the broader lack of adequate disability-inclusive planning. These findings carry implications for the 170+ countries implementing disability-targeted programmes, indicating areas for improvement in the design and delivery of social protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaffa Hameed & Hannah Kuper & Sofoora Kawsar Usman & Lena Morgon Banks, 2025. "Are cash transfers enough to reduce poverty and inequalities for people with disabilities?: a qualitative study on factors affecting the impact of the disability allowance in the Maldives," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 39-51, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:53:y:2025:i:1:p:39-51
    DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2024.2438870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13600818.2024.2438870
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13600818.2024.2438870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:53:y:2025:i:1:p:39-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.